Intervention: Enhancing mental health and well-being around the world

This chapter discusses key conceptual and practical issues related to psychological interventions in a global context. The foundations section reviews the need for mental health services globally, highlighting the potential for psychologists to apply their knowledge and skills around the world and the competencies needed for such work. It highlights the need for psychologists and psychological interventions worldwide. The chapter considers ethical issues, cultural competencies, and the World Health Organization's core competencies in global mental health. In the Applications section, the chapter highlights diverse pathways to care and clinical service settings, such as health care settings, schools, families, and communities. It discusses levels of intervention (i.e., treatment, prevention, strengths-based) and points out emergent areas of global concern in need of psychological interventions, such as the climate crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Along the way, the chapter showcases eight diverse examples of intervention work in international psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Snacking and anxiety during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A prospective cohort study.

Anxiety and snacking increased during the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns, but it remains unknown whether this change in snacking persisted and if it related to anxiety levels. We used prospective data to examine changes in snacking frequency from t1 (eased restrictions in England in May-June 2020) to t2 (national lockdown in December 2020-March 2021), the association of anxiety (assessed by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire at t1) with the snacking change, and the mediating and moderating effects of disinhibition and flexible restraint (assessed by the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire in 2016-17). Analyses including 2128 adults (mean age 28.4 y) residing in England from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children showed that snacking frequency increased over time (mean change 1.23 (95% CI 0.81, 1.65) snacks/wk). Linear regressions of snacking adjusted for sociodemographic covariates showed that having clinical levels of generalised anxiety at t1, versus not, was associated with 1.22 (95% CI 0.07, 2.37) more snacks/wk at t2. Disinhibition partially mediated the association between Generalised Anxiety Disorder and snacking (ßindirect = 0.15, 95% CI 0.01, 0.32), while there was no evidence that flexible restraint moderated the association (ß = 0.05, 95% CI -0.57, 0.66). Our longitudinal findings highlight a detrimental anxiety-snacking association partly operating via disinhibition, suggesting future research could target mitigating anxiety and disinhibited eating behaviours to benefit diet-related outcomes following the pandemic.

Standardizing, harmonizing, and protecting data collection to broaden the impact of COVID-19 research: the rapid acceleration of diagnostics-underserved populations (RADx-UP) initiative.

OBJECTIVE: The Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics-Underserved Populations (RADx-UP) program is a consortium of community-engaged research projects with the goal of increasing access to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) tests in underserved populations. To accelerate clinical research, common data elements (CDEs) were selected and refined to standardize data collection and enhance cross-consortium analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RADx-UP consortium began with more than 700 CDEs from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) CDE Repository, Disaster Research Response (DR2) guidelines, and the PHENotypes and eXposures (PhenX) Toolkit. Following a review of initial CDEs, we made selections and further refinements through an iterative process that included live forums, consultations, and surveys completed by the first 69 RADx-UP projects. RESULTS: Following a multistep CDE development process, we decreased the number of CDEs, modified the question types, and changed the CDE wording. Most research projects were willing to collect and share demographic NIH Tier 1 CDEs, with the top exception reason being a lack of CDE applicability to the project. The NIH RADx-UP Tier 1 CDE with the lowest frequency of collection and sharing was sexual orientation. DISCUSSION: We engaged a wide range of projects and solicited bidirectional input to create CDEs. These RADx-UP CDEs could serve as the foundation for a patient-centered informatics architecture allowing the integration of disease-specific databases to support hypothesis-driven clinical research in underserved populations. CONCLUSION: A community-engaged approach using bidirectional feedback can lead to the better development and implementation of CDEs in underserved populations during public health emergencies.

Developing Successful Palliative Care Teams in Rural Communities: A Facilitated Process.

Background: Developing palliative care (PC) programs in rural settings is challenging due to limitations on training, staff, resources, and reimbursement. Employing established frameworks and processes can assist rural communities in developing quality PC programs. Objective: We sought to employ a facilitated community-centric planning process to guide several rural community teams across three states in the United States to support PC program development. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, observational, quality improvement initiative implemented over 18-24 months. Results: A total of 17 community teams volunteered to participate in the process and completed initial assessments that identified gaps in clinical PC skills in several aspects of PC, including bereavement care, care continuity, pain and symptom management, and communication with family. Teams also identified barriers to optimizing PC for patient and families, including limited community awareness, poor reimbursement mechanisms, lack of resources and experience with PC, and inadequate care coordination. All 17 community teams developed and worked on implementation of a community-specific action plan to develop PC services. However, due to staff capacity limitations imposed by COVID-19, only eight communities completed a follow-up assessment in late 2020. These teams showed some improvement in knowledge of multiple PC domains as a result of the process and provided qualitative feedback indicating that the process was helpful in building capacity to offer needed services and developing the skills and workflows necessary to support delivery of PC. Conclusion: This unique development process can help rural communities organize, develop, and sustain PC programs and overcome common barriers to providing PC.

Stress-Related Disorders of Family Members of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit With COVID-19.

Importance: The psychological symptoms associated with having a family member admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well defined. Objective: To examine the prevalence of symptoms of stress-related disorders, primarily posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), in family members of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 approximately 90 days after admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multisite, mixed-methods observational cohort study assessed 330 family members of patients admitted to the ICU (except in New York City, which had a random sample of 25% of all admitted patients per month) between February 1 and July 31, 2020, at 8 academic-affiliated and 4 community-based hospitals in 5 US states. Exposure: Having a family member in the ICU with COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptoms of PTSD at 3 months, as defined by a score of 10 or higher on the Impact of Events Scale 6 (IES-6). Results: A total of 330 participants (mean [SD] age, 51.2 [15.1] years; 228 [69.1%] women; 150 [52.8%] White; 92 [29.8%] Hispanic) were surveyed at the 3-month time point. Most individuals were the patients' child (129 [40.6%]) or spouse or partner (81 [25.5%]). The mean (SD) IES-6 score at 3 months was 11.9 (6.1), with 201 of 316 respondents (63.6%) having scores of 10 or higher, indicating significant symptoms of PTSD. Female participants had an adjusted mean IES-6 score of 2.6 points higher (95% CI, 1.4-3.8; P < .001) than male participants, whereas Hispanic participants scored a mean of 2.7 points higher compared with non-Hispanic participants (95% CI, 1.0-4.3; P = .002). Those with graduate school experience had an adjusted mean score of 3.3 points lower (95% CI, 1.5-5.1; P < .001) compared with those with up to a high school degree or equivalent. Qualitative analyses found no substantive differences in the emotional or communication-related experiences between those with high vs low PTSD scores, but those with higher scores exhibited more distrust of practitioners. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, symptoms of PTSD among family members of ICU patients with COVID-19 were high. Hispanic ethnicity and female gender were associated with higher symptoms. Those with higher scores reported more distrust of practitioners.

Burn Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessing the Current Literature

Introduction The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has been a significant disruptor to traditional medical care. Burn patients are an interesting population in which to evaluate this disruption due to the complicated, multidisciplinary nature of injury management. Understanding the current landscape of burn care during the pandemic is a crucial first step in preparing for future pandemic impacts. The purpose of this study was to identify the current status of burn treatment during COVID by evaluating existing literature surrounding burns and COVID. Methods A literature review of articles published between March 2020 and August 2021 was conducted to determine trends in studies evaluating burn patients and burn center operation during this time frame. All ABA s published in 2020 containing the key words “burn,” “COVID,” and/or “coronavirus” were reviewed. Additionally, a Pubmed search was conducted using the same keywords. Each and article was sorted into one of four themes: Census/Etiology, Burn patients with COVID, Safe Practices/Protocols, and Telemedicine. Results A total of 23 ABA s and 126 articles were collected in the initial search. 63 articles were ultimately excluded because they did not report on burn patients. By theme, the following trends were seen: 1. Census/Etiology: Data on demographics of burn patients during this period was varied. Admissions for adult and/or pediatric burns increased for multiple burn centers, while others reported decreases. Consistently, the most common etiology of burn injury was scald, and an increased proportion of injuries were found to occur at home. Changes in the rates of first, second, and third-degree burns were also observed. 2. Burn patients with COVID: Overall, numerous reports indicated decreases in patient length of stay. However, several groups found no differences in length of stay, surgery rate, and length of follow-up. 3. Safe Practices: A recurring trend was observed of numerous burn centers having to implement increased safety protocols due to COVID-19. Select burn centers updated prevention guidelines for burn surgeons and patient care. 4. Telemedicine: The implementation of telemedicine helped minimize risk and maximize resources, However, much remains to be standardized, including the quality of images used. Conclusions This analysis of the current literature identified several overarching themes in the care of burn patients. Continued evaluation can identify innovations from the past year that should become best practices, as well as optimize preparation efforts for future disruptions in care.

A Burn Center’s Experience with COVID-19 Positive Burn Patients

Introduction The emergence of SARS-COV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the presentation, treatment, and prognosis of all types of patients. Further characterization and analysis of how concomitant COVID-19 infection impacts different patient populations is important for improving treatment strategies. Patients with burn injures often require ICU-level care, mechanical ventilation, and extensive surgical intervention. Concomitant COVID-19 infection in this population presents a new challenge to clinical teams. The purpose of this project is to compare COVID-19 positive burn patients treated at a regional burn center with those that are not. Methods Following IRB approval, our institution’s burn registry was queried from March 2020-June 2021. Data on demographics, injury circumstances, COVID-19 status, and outcomes were collected. Continuous variables were nonparametric and\compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared with Fischer’s Exact test, where appropriate. Results Of the 622 patients admitted at our institution, 19 tested positive for COVID-19 during their hospitalization. Demographic and injury information is reported in Table 1. There were statistically significant differences between the COVID-19 positive and negative groups in regard to race and presence of inhalation injury (p=0.0002, p=0.0002). The TBSA burned was slightly higher in the COVID-19 positive group (9.1 vs 6.7%). COVID-19 positive patients spent more time ventilated (48±32.5 vs.12.2 ± 16.2 days, p=0.0035**) and had both longer ICU (42.71±37.41 vs 11.1±15.4 days, p=0.0175*) and hospital (26.32±32.14 vs 8.177±11.95 days, p< 0.0001***) lengths of stay (LOS). No COVID-19 positive patients died while 5% of the COVID-19 negative patients did. All outcomes were statistically significant. Conclusions Despite similar TBSA injury burden and age breakdown, patients at our institution who tested positive for COVID-19 required more time on the ventilator and were hospitalized longer. People of color had a higher percentage of positive tests than their Caucasian counterparts. While mortality rates were higher in the COVID-19 negative cohort, morbidities associated with longer LOS must be considered.

Baking Bread and Other New Hobbies: Characterizing Burn Center Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction The effects of the ongoing COVID19 pandemic are wide-reaching and still emerging. Fear of the virus, public health messaging, and government-instituted lockdowns have altered how Americans live, work, and use the healthcare system. There is minimal data that assesses how the COVID-19 pandemic and associated stay at home orders have influenced the etiology of burn injuries. With the majority of burns occurring in the home, it is possible lock down orders have significantly impacted etiology of major burn injuries. This project aims to characterize the demographics and injury characteristics of burn patients seen at a regional burn center during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Following IRB approval, our institution queried it’s burn registry from March 2020-June 2021. Data on demographics, injury circumstance and details, interventions, COVID-19 status, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were obtained for the population. Results There were 622 inpatient admissions during the study timeframe. Patients were primarily Black (44.4%) or Caucasian (32.6%) males (65.6%) identifying as Non-Hispanic (81.8%). The mean age was 46.73±18.6 years. Mean total TBSA burned was 6.7±10.7%, 2nd and 3rd degree percentages were 2.11±4.64 and 0.62±5.2 respectively with 47 total inhalation injuries. Top burn etiologies were 244 (39.2%) scald and 175 (28.1%) flame with 249 (40%) coded etiology associated with food prep or consumption. The majority of the burns occurred at home (93%). Time from injury to admission was 616.98±2199.42 minutes and time to first excision from admission was 4314.3 ± 5657.3 minutes. ICU and hospital length of stay were 12.7±18.3 and 8.73±13.3 days. In-hospital mortality was 31 (5%). Nineteen patients tested positive for COVID-19 during this time. Conclusions Nearly half of all burn center admissions were for cooking related etiologies during this time. Time to admission was over 10 hours in a population dense area. More information of site specific pre-pandemic etiology and treatment data are needed to fully understand these initial findings. Further sub-analyses may also elucidate the influence of pandemic related behavioral changes as public health mandates evolved over time.

The impact of COVID-19 movement restrictions on physical activity in a low-income semi-rural population in Malaysia: A longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted movement restrictions in countries worldwide, impacting on physical activity (PA), a major non-communicable disease risk factor, and thus may have unintentional long-term health implications. In semi-rural areas of low-middle-income-countries (LMICs), where occupational activity is the main source of PA, changes in PA associated with COVID-19 restrictions are unknown. We investigated the impact of Movement Control Order (MCO) restrictions in a semi-rural region of Malaysia. METHODS: The South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) is a dynamic prospective community cohort. We contacted a random sample of 1007 adults (18+) who had previously provided PA data in 2018. We asked about PA during the MCO (March-May 2020) and at the time of interview (June 2020). RESULTS: During the MCO, PA reduced by a mean of 6.7 hours/week (95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.3, 8.0) compared to 2018, with the largest reductions among those in employment. By June, PA was 3.4 hours/week (95% CI = 2.0, 4.8) less than 2018, leaving 34% of adults currently inactive (20% in 2018). Reductions in occupational PA were not replaced with active travel or activity at home. Despite these observed reductions, most participants did not think the MCO had affected their PA. CONCLUSIONS: Movement restrictions are associated with lower PA lasting beyond the period of strict restrictions; such longer-term reductions in PA may have a detrimental impact on health. Future MCOs should encourage people to be active, but may additionally need targeted messaging for those who don't necessarily realise they are at risk. In particular, policies developed in more affluent countries may not easily translate to LMICs.

Exploring factors associated with pregnant women's experiences of material hardship during COVID-19: a cross-sectional Qualtrics survey in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the financial insecurity of women and their families globally. Some studies have explored the impact of financial strain among pregnant women, in particular, during the pandemic. However, less is known about the factors associated with pregnant women's experiences of material hardship. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a non-probability sample to examine the factors associated with pregnant women's experiences of material hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic. In January 2021, 183 pregnant women living in the United States participated in an online Qualtrics panel survey. In addition to socio-demographic characteristics, individuals were asked about their finances and predictors of financial well-being, mental health symptoms, and intimate partner violence (IPV) experiences. Chi-square analysis and one-way ANOVA were used to examine whether women's experiences with material hardship and associated factors differed by income level (i.e., less than $20,000; $20,000 to $60,000; more than $60,000). Ordinary least squares regression was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted estimates. RESULTS: Study findings showed that the majority of women in the sample experienced at least one form of material hardship in the past year. Individuals with an annual household income less than $20,000 reported the highest average number of material hardships experienced (M = 3.7, SD = 2.8). Compared to women with household incomes less than $20,000, women with incomes of more than $60,000 reported significantly fewer material hardships, less financial strain, and higher levels of financial support, economic self-efficacy, and economic-self-sufficiency. Women with incomes of $60,000 or more also reported significantly lower levels of psychological abuse, and a smaller percentage met the cut-off for anxiety. Economic self-sufficiency, financial strain, posttraumatic stress disorder, and economic abuse were all significantly associated with material hardship. CONCLUSIONS: A contribution of this study is that it highlights the significant, positive association between economic abuse, a unique form of IPV, and material hardship among pregnant women during the pandemic. These findings suggest the need for policy and practice interventions that help to ameliorate the financial insecurity experienced by some pregnant women, as well as respond to associated bidirectional vulnerabilities (e.g., mental health symptoms, experiences of IPV).

Compounded Cerium Nitrate-Silver Sulfadiazine Cream is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Burn Wounds: A Burn Center's 4-Year Experience.

Wound infections and sepsis are significant causes of morbidity after burn injury and can be alleviated by early excision and grafting. In situations that preclude early surgery, topical agents allow for a safer delay. Cerium nitrate compounded with silver sulfadiazine (Ce-SSD) is a burn cream that provides broad antibacterial activity, forms a temporary barrier, and promotes re-epithelialization. Methemoglobinemia is a rare, but oft-cited, systemic complication of Ce-SSD. In this retrospective review, 157 patients treated with Ce-SSD between July 2014 and July 2018 were identified, and the monitoring protocol for methemoglobinemia during Ce-SSD treatment was evaluated. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47-70.5 years), with TBSA of 8.5% (IQR, 3-27), adjusted Baux score of 76 (IQR, 59-94), and inhalation injury present in 9.9% of patients. Primary endpoints included incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic methemoglobinemia. Of the 9.6% (n = 15) of patients with methemoglobinemia, 73.3% (n = 11) had maximum methemoglobin levels ≥72 hours from the time of the first application. One patient developed clinically significant methemoglobinemia. Patients with TBSA ≥20% were more likely to develop methemoglobinemia (odds ratio 9.318, 95% confidence interval 2.078-65.73, P = .0078); however, neither Ce-SSD doses nor days of exposure were significant predictors. Ce-SSD application to temporize burn wounds until excision and grafting is safe, effective, and, in asymptomatic patients with TBSA <20%, can be used without serial blood gas monitoring. Vigilant monitoring for symptoms should be performed in patients with TBSA ≥20%, but routine blood gases are not necessary.